Why rescue some animals but essentially endorse the slaughter of others for food? · the public generally rallies behind no kill shelters and their allegedly more ethical treatment of animals. Im going to say something that is probably quite controversial but. a lot of people who adopt do so either because theyve been guilted into doing so or because they feel like they have the moral high ground by having a rescue dog. On social media, many animal enthusiasts have criticized the decision to euthanize the dogs, causing an uproar. Since many purebred dog rescue services are operated by groups of fanciers and hobby breeders, many shelters worry that the dogs released to them will be placed unaltered or worse, deliberately bred. But there are some surprisingly controversial aspects to no killer shelters. Because there are homeless animals awaiting adoption in almost every community in the nation , the aspca firmly believes that when people decide to bring a pet into their homes, they should first consider adoption from a shelter or rescue group. · my experience begs a question that sounds similar to one that dr. Melanie joy, psychologist and author of why we love dogs, eat pigs and wear cows, has posed: The kardashians are known for their extravagant lifestyle and significant cultural influence. However, this recent event has shifted the spotlight toward the ethics of responsible pet ownership. · according to a klbk everything lubbock article, lubbock animal services was criticized for euthanizing 12 rescue dogs at the behest of their owners.

📖 Continue Reading: