For instance, drone regulation can be prescriptive and focus on inputs: Innovative and adaptive This needs to change. The modern regulatory models are innovative and adaptive. For business leaders, adapting to this regulatory wave is not just about compliance, but about. The world is experiencing a technological and social revolution moving with exponential velocity. See full list on digitalregulation. org “one must have a license to fly a drone with more than. Key sectors like technology, manufacturing, energy, logistics, and retail are feeling the effects of reshaped regulatory policies. The first capital city in the world to regulate ridesharing was canberra in australia. For instance, airbnb went from startup in 2008. Regulators can seek feedback using a number of “soft-law” innovative instruments such as policy labs, regulatory sandboxes, crowdsourci. · explore the evolving landscape of digital regulation , from gdpr to the digital services act, understand how new technologies and geopolitical pressures are shaping the future of compliance and accountability. · for compliance leaders looking at the next 12 to 24 months of regulation , the question is not whether to modernize governance. Innovative technological trends such as artificial intelligence (ai), the internet of things (iot), blockchain, robotics, 3d printing, nanotechnology, augmented and virtual reality, emerge and converge bringing about a new digital era. Researchers and policymakers have begun to outline new approaches to address these gaps centering on the need for policy innovation, new regulatory authorities, and even new agencies to provide the needed guardrails, expertise, and enforcement capability. In the past two years, numerous countries have begun to establish robust governance frameworks for ai. Traditional regulatory structures are complex, fragmented, risk-averse, and adjust slowly to shifting social circumstances, with various public agencies having overlapping authority. It is dynamic and based on real-time data flows between the private sector and regulators. It is whether you will do it before the next audit, the next regulatory update, or the next major data request that reveals how brittle the current approach really is. They rely on trial and error and co-design of regulation and standards and have shorter feedback loops. Outcome-focused regulations stipulate positive outcomes that regulators want to encourage. Firms in compliance would be listed as safe, and if not, the data systems could produce a set of action items to meet the standard. This new digital. While streamlining regulations promotes economic activity, the divergence between federal initiatives and state actions complicates compliance efforts. By working with key stakeholders from the private sector, the non-for-profit sector, and academia, regulators can ensure that they co-create an environment where transformative technologies are built with consumer safety, privacy and security in mind and where digital products and services are as inclusive and affordable as they are innovative. On the other hand, a unicorn startup can develop into a company with a global reach in a couple of years, if not months. Outcome-focused regulation is a set of rules that prescribe achieving specific, desirable, and measurable results, unlike traditional prescriptive and input-based regulatory models. This offers the private sector greater flexibility in choosing its way of complying with the law. Traditional regulatory models are time consuming and robust. The european union has been a frontrunner in this area with its draft ai act, and countries such as the united states, canada, china, and the united kingdom have followed suit. It takes months and sometimes years to draft new regulations in response to market developments and technology push. The data could then be compared with regulations to decide whether a firm is in compliance. Evidence-based regulation is a modern regulatory model that is data-driven and risk-based. · ai regulation is no longer a theoretical concern—it is a current and accelerating reality. Focus on financial crime regulation (inclusive of sanctions, anti-corruption, know-your-customer, anti-money laundering, beneficial ownership, etc. ) is unlikely to abate in 2025. This trend stems from the adoption of risk-based approaches to ai regu.

📖 Continue Reading: